Jada Robinson vs Thea Frodin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Apr at 11:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Robinson vs T. Frodin

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Robinson 1 - 0 Frodin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jada Robinson winning 2 and Thea Frodin winning 0. The last match between Jada Robinson and Thea Frodin was at the W35 Boca Raton, 09-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jada Robinson getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Robinson | 1 |
| Frodin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Boca Raton(04-09-25)
J. Robinson vs T. Frodin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.20% (127-126) | Career Total W/L | 36.67% (11-19) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Robinson vs T. Frodin Match Preview:
Is there a statistic that can predict the outcome of a tennis match with precision? While no single metric is foolproof, analyzing second serve performance offers intriguing clues. Over the past six months, Robinson has secured 40.4% of points on their second serve, an impressive feat compared to Frodin's 0%. A solid second serve is often a cornerstone of success, and in this matchup, it firmly tips the scales in Robinson's favor.
We move on to the battlefield of return games, where the ability to counter an opponent’s serve is pivotal. In recent times, Robinson's prowess is evident, having won 49.03% of their adversary's second serve points, while Frodin has once again secured none. This trend continues with first serve return stats, displaying Robinson at 33.33% and Frodin at 0%. Such figures tell a compelling story favoring Robinson in this head-to-head confrontation.
How do the players fare under the critical gaze of pressure? Here, Robinson shines, having saved 46.92% of breakpoints faced recently, starkly contrasting with Frodin's complete absence of breakpoint saves. This facet of the game is crucial, particularly for those invested in live match betting.
Surveying performances over the past year paints an even starker contrast. Robinson has clinched 50.91% of their matches (28 wins and 27 losses), whereas Frodin has managed only a 16.67% success rate (1 win and 5 losses). Such a performance overview hands another advantage to Robinson in forecasting the match outcome.
Surface preferences also weigh in on our prediction. Robinson's career best is set on indoor hard courts with a 55% win rate (12 wins, 10 losses), yet they don’t favor clay as much, securing a 45% win rate (34 wins, 42 losses). Frodin shows modest success on hard courts with a 27% win rate (3 wins, 8 losses) and struggles on clay without any wins (0 wins, 2 losses). The numbers here again herald Robinson as the likely victor.
Exploring player development, recent tournaments reveal more insights. Robinson competes in the Challengers and ITF circuits, boasting a balanced 50% match win rate (25 wins, 25 losses). In stark contrast, Frodin has not won a single match (0 wins, 4 losses). Such disparities are indicative of their readiness and skill levels.
Opponent caliber further delineates player capabilities. Robinson, with a year of encounters against opponents averaging a rank of 332.73, boasts a slightly stronger resume compared to Frodin's experience against players with an average rank of 434.17. Such opposition quality suggests Robinson is more seasoned against challenging adversaries.
For those considering the potential of a match-extending set, Robinson holds an edge, having won 33% of deciding sets recently, while Frodin lags behind with no wins. As the game winds through critical moments, break point conversion emerges as a crucial element. Here, Robinson converts 34.19% of their opportunities, whereas Frodin again has yet to break their opponent's serve even once.
Transitioning from raw data analysis to a definitive prediction, Robinson stands out as the front-runner. With superior performance metrics across all crucial facets, expect Robinson to secure victory with calculated and strategic finesse.
Jada Robinson vs Thea Frodin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Robinson vs T. Frodin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 60% (29/48) | 1st Serve % | 59% (44/74) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (12/30) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (39/74) | Return Points Win % | 33% (16/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Robinson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-6(0) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | ||
T. Frodin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 2-6 6-2 10-5 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 2-6 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||

J. Robinson vs T. Frodin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.20% (127/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.67% (11/19) |
| 49.66% (288/292) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.58% (28/41) |
| 49.51% (2578/2629) | Games Win/Loss | 43.87% (286/366) |
| 49.64% (68/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 50.00% (47/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 54.55% (12/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 44 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.49 |
| 317 | Total Double Faults | 156 |
| 1:2:19 | Average Match Time | 1:26:21 |
| 415.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.77 |
| 63% (6508/10277) | 1st Serve % | 57% (864/1511) |
| 60% (3916/6508) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (526/864) |
| 44% (1660/3769) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (235/647) |
| 47% (534/1138) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (83/199) |
| 44% (4408/10053) | Return Points Win % | 45% (740/1628) |
| 49.48% (95/97) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (2/10) |
| 52.46% (32/29) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 49% (122/248) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (19/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 49% (37/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 85% (117/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (12/9) |
| 15% (117/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (12/3) |
| 20% (136/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (18/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Anastasija Sevastova vs Barbora Krejcikova Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 9th December 2025 Best Bets

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Katarzyna Kawa Betting Tips & Picks December 9, 2025

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Jessika Ponchet Betting Tips & Picks December 10, 2025

Cristina Bucsa vs Teodora Kostovic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets

Eva Vedder vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets
